Lecorpio - straight forward, easy to use
Lecoprio is used by a single department in our firm and is fundamental to our relationship with our clients. Through Lecorpio, we …
Overview
What is AQX Corporate?
AQX Corporate is an IP management software platform for corporate legal teams, used to streamline operations and enable strategic decision-making through process automation, business intelligence, and analytics.
Recent Reviews
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is AQX Corporate?
AQX Corporate is an IP management software platform for corporate legal teams, used to streamline operations and enable strategic decision-making through process automation, business intelligence, and analytics.
AQX Corporate Technical Details
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
|---|---|
| Mobile Application | No |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(4)Reviews
(1-2 of 2)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
One of the big corporate clients at my previous firm used Lecorpio to communicate with their outside counsel regarding patent legal matters. The platform was used for reporting filings and correspondence, storing files and for communications between the client and the firm. Lecorpio replaced the previous ways of reporting and communicating via email, facsimile, US Mail, and telephone.
- It's convenient to have the whole case history, including correspondence in one place online.
- It makes the patent prosecution process more efficient when everyone is using one platform and there are set, easy ways of doing certain things: for example, reporting takes less time when it's done via Lecorpio rather than drafting and sending emails.
- It is more secure to send privileged documents via Lecorpio because the risk of typing a wrong email address and sending a document to the wrong person is eliminated.
- Personally, I did not like the Lecorpio interface that we used (it was all dull grey), it lacked the aesthetic quality that other platforms have (for example, Ipendo)
- Some of the features were confusing. Sometimes, we would report things under certain categories and then we would get emails from the client to upload them. It would have been helpful to have all features be very simple and straightforward, so that there is no confusion about where to find certain files. Simpler categorizations would have been nice.
- By comparison, I think that Ipendo was more user-friendly and easy to follow than Lecorpio.
- Ipendo
Ipendo has a better interface and I feel like it is more intuitive to use in the patent prosecution field. It is
clear and easy - the tabs clearly define items hidden under them, it is easy to upload and download items to and from that platform.
On the other hand, I like that Lecorpio automatically stored the correspondence sent via the platform and in Ipendo, it has to be saved separately, so Lecorpio has that advantage (one less step).
clear and easy - the tabs clearly define items hidden under them, it is easy to upload and download items to and from that platform.
On the other hand, I like that Lecorpio automatically stored the correspondence sent via the platform and in Ipendo, it has to be saved separately, so Lecorpio has that advantage (one less step).
March 22, 2016
It's simple... which is good, but limiting.
Lecorpio is used by one of our clients to track and manage their IP portfolio.
- Well, it's super easy to find what your looking for, as there are so many different fields for searching. It even handles Boolean searches pretty well... and partial searches.
- The layout is easy to read, logical and clear.
- It seems like a fairly stable application. I don't recall it "going down" much.
- The updates are few and far between. I have had issues where the laws surrounding docket requirements were slow to keep up and going in manually to change docket dates is kind of cumbersome. It's been a while though since I had to do that....
- As a management for references, this leaves much to be desired. It is cumbersome to enter references and I'm not aware that is cross cites at all.
- It does seems slow to changes-- we requested an annuity tab be added-- takes a while to implement.
- Foundation IP
This is a better choice for tracking references for cross-cited application families. Lecorpio doesn't distinguish between families and applications related only by subject matter. However, its layout is poor and I would choose to have different information in the header, more like the Lecorpio set ups and layout. It also seems slower to use, more cumbersome in navigation.